[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <520B4E71.9000907@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 12:31:29 +0300
From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
To: <balbi@...com>
CC: Benoit Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>, <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] usb: phy-nop: Use RESET Controller for managing the
reset line
Hi Felipe,
On 07/25/2013 08:28 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:53:05AM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> Till now we were modelling the RESET line as a voltage regulator and
>> using the regulator framework to manage it.
>>
>> [1] introduces a GPIO based reset controller driver. We use that
>> to manage the PHY reset line, at least for DT boots. For legacy boots,
>> will still need to use the regulator framework for reset lines.
>>
>> [1] - http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/41348
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
>
> that's not in mainline yet, right ? Is it guaranteed that it will hit
> v3.12 merge window ?
>
Looks like the gpio reset driver might not make it into 3.12.
Now we have two options.
1) leave the nop-phy driver as it is
2) get rid of using regulator framework for reset line and handle the reset
gpio directly in the nop-phy driver.
Is it already too late to get (2) into 3.12 if I send the patches in a day or 2?
cheers,
-roger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists