linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] mce: acpi/apei: trace: Enable ghes memory error trace event

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 14 Aug 2013 14:18:11 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>,
	"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	"rjw@...k.pl" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	"lance.ortiz@...com" <lance.ortiz@...com>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Aristeu Rozanski Filho <arozansk@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mce: acpi/apei: trace: Enable ghes memory error
 trace event

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 04:17:26PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> - One, the logging format for APEI data is a bit verbose and hard
> to parse. But, I suppose we could work with this if we make a few
> changes. Is it ok to change how the APEI data is made available
> through mc_event->driver_detail?

How?

> - Two, if ghes_edac is enabled, it prevents other edac drivers
> from being loaded. It looks like the assumption here is that if
> ghes/firmware first is enabled, then *all* memory errors are reported
> through ghes which is not true. We could have (a subset of) corrected
> errors reported through ghes, some through CMCI and uncorrected errors
> through MCE. So, if I'm not mistaken, if ghes_edac is enabled, we will
> only receive ghes error events through mc_event and not the others.

The idea is to have a single tracepoint reporting memory errors. Where
you call it from shouldn't matter. Now, we have to make sure that we
don't report the same event more than once over different paths.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/