[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <04c2fe3a595a11096e89a886b5271951bbe28f47.1376486713.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 19:02:08 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: rjw@...k.pl
Cc: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 19/37] cpufreq: longhaul: don't initialize part of policy that is set by core too
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.
Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c b/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c
index e566776..45bafdd 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c
@@ -904,7 +904,6 @@ static int longhaul_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
longhaul_setup_voltagescaling();
policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 200000; /* nsec */
- policy->cur = calc_speed(longhaul_get_cpu_mult());
return cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(policy, longhaul_table);
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists