[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <520B9700.7010105@roeck-us.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 07:41:04 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@...aro.org>
CC: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+
On 08/14/2013 05:44 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 14 August 2013 11:33, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:04:08PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> Hacked diff is below. Can I write that up as clean patch and submit it,
>>> or do we need a test on real hardware ?
>>
>> Well, if we want to ensure that it is really correct, the sensible thing
>> to do is to try it on real hardware, otherwise we're risking yet another
>> change to this.
>>
>> Earlier in this thread, some people said that they have the hardware, so
>> it shouldn't be that difficult to get it tested on real stuff.
>
> Yes, I definitely think we should test on the hardware before we
> land yet another change to this PCI code that hasn't really been
> thoroughly tested on anything. I have the board/backplane on my
Agreed.
> desk but it'll be later in the week before I can do the testing
> (currently still messing with uboot config to get it to actually
> boot a kernel).
>
That would be great. Thanks a lot for your help!
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists