lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1376438836-13339-2-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org>
Date:	Tue, 13 Aug 2013 17:07:09 -0700
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	x86@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] x86: Add 1/2/4/8 byte optimization to 64bit __copy_{from,to}_user_inatomic

From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>

The 64bit __copy_{from,to}_user_inatomic always called
copy_from_user_generic, but skipped the special optimizations for 1/2/4/8
byte accesses.

This especially hurts the futex call, which accesses the 4 byte futex
user value with a complicated fast string operation in a function call,
instead of a single movl.

Use __copy_{from,to}_user for _inatomic instead to get the same
optimizations. The only problem was the might_fault() in those functions.
So move that to new wrapper and call __copy_{f,t}_user_nocheck()
from *_inatomic directly.

32bit already did this correctly by duplicating the code.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
index 4f7923d..64476bb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
@@ -77,11 +77,10 @@ int copy_to_user(void __user *dst, const void *src, unsigned size)
 }
 
 static __always_inline __must_check
-int __copy_from_user(void *dst, const void __user *src, unsigned size)
+int __copy_from_user_nocheck(void *dst, const void __user *src, unsigned size)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	might_fault();
 	if (!__builtin_constant_p(size))
 		return copy_user_generic(dst, (__force void *)src, size);
 	switch (size) {
@@ -121,11 +120,17 @@ int __copy_from_user(void *dst, const void __user *src, unsigned size)
 }
 
 static __always_inline __must_check
-int __copy_to_user(void __user *dst, const void *src, unsigned size)
+int __copy_from_user(void *dst, const void __user *src, unsigned size)
+{
+	might_fault();
+	return __copy_from_user_nocheck(dst, src, size);
+}
+
+static __always_inline __must_check
+int __copy_to_user_nocheck(void __user *dst, const void *src, unsigned size)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	might_fault();
 	if (!__builtin_constant_p(size))
 		return copy_user_generic((__force void *)dst, src, size);
 	switch (size) {
@@ -165,6 +170,13 @@ int __copy_to_user(void __user *dst, const void *src, unsigned size)
 }
 
 static __always_inline __must_check
+int __copy_to_user(void __user *dst, const void *src, unsigned size)
+{
+	might_fault();
+	return __copy_to_user_nocheck(dst, src, size);
+}
+
+static __always_inline __must_check
 int __copy_in_user(void __user *dst, const void __user *src, unsigned size)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
@@ -220,13 +232,13 @@ int __copy_in_user(void __user *dst, const void __user *src, unsigned size)
 static __must_check __always_inline int
 __copy_from_user_inatomic(void *dst, const void __user *src, unsigned size)
 {
-	return copy_user_generic(dst, (__force const void *)src, size);
+	return __copy_from_user_nocheck(dst, (__force const void *)src, size);
 }
 
 static __must_check __always_inline int
 __copy_to_user_inatomic(void __user *dst, const void *src, unsigned size)
 {
-	return copy_user_generic((__force void *)dst, src, size);
+	return __copy_to_user_nocheck((__force void *)dst, src, size);
 }
 
 extern long __copy_user_nocache(void *dst, const void __user *src,
-- 
1.8.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ