[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1308141719480.4470@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:43:22 +0100
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] xen: introduce XENMEM_get_dma_buf and
xen_put_dma_buf
On Fri, 9 Aug 2013, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > + * requested. The new pages are going to be "pinned": it's guaranteed
> > + * that their p2m mapping won't be changed until explicitly "unpinned".
>
> What if you try to balloon them out? What happens then? Does that
> unpin them automatically?
>
> What if I use said "pin" page for grants? Can they be shared with another
> guest?
I'll mention that only normal guest r/w memory can be pinned.
> > + * If return code is zero then @out.extent_list provides the MFNs of the
> > + * newly-allocated memory. Returns zero on complete success, otherwise
> > + * a negative error code.
>
> Ahem. Which ones? I know you didn't like the existing grant code b/c it
> returned some general error. Would it make sense to say which are ones
> are expected?
I'll do that.
> > + * On complete success then always @nr_exchanged == @in.nr_extents. On
> > + * partial success @nr_exchanged indicates how much work was done.
>
> And no error?
> > + */
> > +struct xen_get_dma_buf {
> > + /*
> > + * [IN] Details of memory extents to be exchanged (GMFN bases).
> > + * Note that @in.address_bits is ignored and unused.
>
> Ohhhh, why? What if the user wants to be it under 2G?
As per the other email, that goes in out.address_bits. I'll add a note.
> > + */
> > + struct xen_memory_reservation in;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * [IN/OUT] Details of new memory extents.
> > + * We require that:
> > + * 1. @in.domid == @out.domid
> > + * 2. @in.nr_extents << @in.extent_order ==
> > + * @out.nr_extents << @out.extent_order
> > + * 3. @in.extent_start and @out.extent_start lists must not overlap
> > + * 4. @out.extent_start lists GPFN bases to be populated
> > + * 5. @out.extent_start is overwritten with allocated GMFN bases
> > + */
> > + struct xen_memory_reservation out;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * [OUT] Number of input extents that were successfully exchanged:
> > + * 1. The first @nr_exchanged input extents were successfully
> > + * deallocated.
> > + * 2. The corresponding first entries in the output extent list correctly
> > + * indicate the GMFNs that were successfully exchanged.
> > + * 3. All other input and output extents are untouched.
> > + * 4. If not all input exents are exchanged then the return code of this
> > + * command will be non-zero.
> > + * 5. THIS FIELD MUST BE INITIALISED TO ZERO BY THE CALLER!
> > + */
> > + xen_ulong_t nr_exchanged;
> > +};
> > +DEFINE_GUEST_HANDLE_STRUCT(xen_get_dma_buf);
> > +
> > +#define XENMEM_put_dma_buf 27
> > +/*
> > + * XENMEM_put_dma_buf unpins a set of pages, previously pinned by
> > + * XENMEM_get_dma_buf. After this call the p2m mapping of the pages can
> > + * be transparently changed by the hypervisor, as usual. The pages are
> > + * still accessible from the guest.
>
> I don't understand what 'pinned' means. What is a 'pinned' page versus
> a normal page? Is this like the pagetables which must be _RO?
A pinned page is just a normal page that the hypervisor promises is
going to keep having the same machine address until unpinned.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists