lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 16:07:48 -0400 From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> To: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] mm: make lru_add_drain_all() selective Hello, Chris. On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 01:18:31PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote: > On 8/14/2013 12:57 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Hello, Chris. > > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:03:39PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote: > >> Tejun, I don't know if you have a better idea for how to mark a > >> work_struct as being "not used" so we can set and test it here. > >> Is setting entry.next to NULL good? Should we offer it as an API > >> in the workqueue header? > > Maybe simply defining a static cpumask would be cleaner? > > I think you're right, actually. Andrew, Tejun, how does this look? Looks good to me. Please feel free to add Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists