[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <520BF835.5080309@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 15:35:49 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
CC: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Joseph Lo <josephl@...dia.com>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>, gnurou@...il.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] ARM: add basic Trusted Foundations support
On 08/12/2013 08:29 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> Trusted Foundations is a TrustZone-based secure monitor for ARM that
> can be invoked using a consistent smc-based API on all supported
> platforms. This patch adds initial basic support for Trusted
> Foundations using the ARM firmware API. Current features are limited
> to the ability to boot secondary processors.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/firmware/tl,trusted-foundations.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/firmware/tl,trusted-foundations.txt
> +Trusted Foundations
> +
> +Boards that use the Trusted Foundations secure monitor can signal its
> +presence by declaring a node compatible with "tl,trusted-foundations"
> +(the name and location of the node does not matter).
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible : "tl,trusted-foundations"
> +- version : Must contain the version number string of the Trusted Foundation
> + firmware.
Can the version be queried at run-time from the firmware itself?
If not, I wonder if we shouldn't instead encode the version number into
the compatible value.
Some comments on the exact format of the version property would be
useful; from the example I assume it's "%02d.%02d" % (major_ver, minor_ver)?
> diff --git a/arch/arm/firmware/Kconfig b/arch/arm/firmware/Kconfig
> +config ARCH_SUPPORTS_TRUSTED_FOUNDATIONS
> + bool
Shouldn't that be "config ARCH_SUPPORTS_FIRMWARE", since presumably in
the future there will be more entries in the menu, and hence we want the
menu to appear if any of those entries are useful?
> +
> +menu "Firmware options"
> + depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_TRUSTED_FOUNDATIONS
Or perhaps that comment is more appropriate for that "depends".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists