[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <520BF94F.60907@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 15:40:31 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
CC: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Joseph Lo <josephl@...dia.com>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>, gnurou@...il.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] ARM: tegra: set CPU reset handler with firmware
op
On 08/12/2013 08:29 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> Use a firmware operation to set the CPU reset handler and only resort to
> doing it ourselves if there is none defined.
>
> This supports the booting of secondary CPUs on devices using a TrustZone
> secure monitor.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/reset.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/reset.c
> + err = call_firmware_op(set_cpu_boot_addr, 0, reset_address);
> + switch (err) {
> + case -ENOSYS:
> + tegra_cpu_reset_handler_set(reset_address);
> + /* pass-through */
> + case 0:
> + is_enabled = true;
> + break;
> + default:
> + pr_crit("Cannot set CPU reset handler: %d\n", err);
> + BUG();
> + }
Instead of trying and failing, does it make sense to register
tegra_cpu_reset_handler_set() as the set_cpu_boot_addr firmware op when
there is no firmware present? That would simplify all call-sites of any
firmware op.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists