| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <520C0800.3090700@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 15:43:12 -0700
From: Rohit Vaswani <rvaswani@...eaurora.org>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@...eaurora.org>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>,
David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 4/4] ARM: msm: Add support for 8974 SMP
On 8/2/2013 8:46 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Aug 1, 2013, at 9:15 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
>
>> Add the cpus bindings and the Kraitv2 release sequence
>> to make SMP work for 2 cores on MSM8974.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rohit Vaswani <rvaswani@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt | 1 +
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/msm8974.dts | 23 ++++++++
>> arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8974.c | 3 +
>> arch/arm/mach-msm/platsmp.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 106 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt
>> index 1132eac..7c3c677 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt
>> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ For the ARM architecture every CPU node must contain the following properties:
>> This should be one of:
>> "qcom,scss"
>> "qcom,kpssv1"
>> + "qcom,kpssv2"
>>
>> Example:
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/msm8974.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/msm8974.dts
>> index c31c097..ef35a9b 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/msm8974.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/msm8974.dts
>> @@ -7,6 +7,22 @@
>> compatible = "qcom,msm8974";
>> interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
>>
>> + cpus {
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> + compatible = "qcom,krait";
>> + device_type = "cpu";
>> + enable-method = "qcom,kpssv2";
>> +
>> + cpu@0 {
>> + reg = <0>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + cpu@1 {
>> + reg = <1>;
>> + };
> Any reason not to have all 4 cores?
>
>> + };
>> +
>> intc: interrupt-controller@...00000 {
>> compatible = "qcom,msm-qgic2";
>> interrupt-controller;
>> @@ -23,4 +39,11 @@
>> <1 1 0xf08>;
>> clock-frequency = <19200000>;
>> };
>> +
>> + kpss@...12000 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,kpss";
>> + reg = <0xf9012000 0x1000>,
>> + <0xf9088000 0x1000>,
>> + <0xf9098000 0x1000>;
> we should probably have regnmaes to go along with this.
>
> Also this doesn't really match the binding spec, as you've included the L2 register, we should cleanup the binding spec to be more precise.
Its part of the Krait Processor Sub-System. I will add the reg-names to
clear this up.
>
>> + };
>> };
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8974.c b/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8974.c
>> index d7f84f2..06119f9 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8974.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8974.c
>> @@ -13,11 +13,14 @@
>> #include <linux/of_platform.h>
>> #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
>>
>> +#include "common.h"
>> +
>> static const char * const msm8974_dt_match[] __initconst = {
>> "qcom,msm8974",
>> NULL
>> };
>>
>> DT_MACHINE_START(MSM8974_DT, "Qualcomm MSM (Flattened Device Tree)")
>> + .smp = smp_ops(msm_smp_ops),
>> .dt_compat = msm8974_dt_match,
>> MACHINE_END
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-msm/platsmp.c
>> index 82eb079..0fdae69 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/platsmp.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/platsmp.c
>> @@ -124,6 +124,80 @@ static int msm8960_release_secondary(unsigned int cpu)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static int msm8974_release_secondary(unsigned int cpu)
>> +{
>> + void __iomem *reg;
>> + void __iomem *l2_saw_base;
>> + struct device_node *dn = NULL;
>> + unsigned apc_pwr_gate_ctl = 0x14;
>> + unsigned reg_val;
>> +
>> + if (cpu == 0 || cpu >= num_possible_cpus())
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + dn = of_find_compatible_node(dn, NULL, "qcom,kpss");
>> + if (!dn) {
>> + pr_err("%s : Missing kpss node from device tree\n", __func__);
>> + return -ENXIO;
>> + }
>> +
>> + reg = of_iomap(dn, cpu+1);
>> + if (!reg)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + pr_debug("Starting secondary CPU %d\n", cpu);
>> +
>> + /* Turn on the BHS, turn off LDO Bypass and power down LDO */
>> + reg_val = 0x403f0001;
>> + writel_relaxed(reg_val, reg + apc_pwr_gate_ctl);
>> +
>> + /* complete the above write before the delay */
>> + mb();
>> + /* wait for the bhs to settle */
>> + udelay(1);
>> +
>> + /* Turn on BHS segments */
>> + reg_val |= 0x3f << 1;
>> + writel_relaxed(reg_val, reg + apc_pwr_gate_ctl);
>> +
>> + /* complete the above write before the delay */
>> + mb();
>> + /* wait for the bhs to settle */
>> + udelay(1);
>> +
>> + /* Finally turn on the bypass so that BHS supplies power */
>> + reg_val |= 0x3f << 8;
>> + writel_relaxed(reg_val, reg + apc_pwr_gate_ctl);
>> +
>> + /* enable max phases */
>> + l2_saw_base = of_iomap(dn, 0);
>> + if (!l2_saw_base) {
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> + writel_relaxed(0x10003, l2_saw_base + 0x1c);
>> + mb();
>> + udelay(50);
>> +
>> + iounmap(l2_saw_base);
>> +
>> + writel_relaxed(0x021, reg+0x04);
>> + mb();
>> + udelay(2);
>> +
>> + writel_relaxed(0x020, reg+0x04);
>> + mb();
>> + udelay(2);
>> +
>> + writel_relaxed(0x000, reg+0x04);
>> + mb();
>> +
>> + writel_relaxed(0x080, reg+0x04);
>> + mb();
>> +
>> + iounmap(reg);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, cold_boot_done);
>>
>> static void boot_cold_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
>> @@ -151,6 +225,11 @@ static void boot_cold_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
>> msm8960_release_secondary(cpu);
>> per_cpu(cold_boot_done, cpu) = true;
>> }
>> + } else if (!strcmp(enable_method, "qcom,kpssv2")) {
>> + if (per_cpu(cold_boot_done, cpu) == false) {
>> + msm8974_release_secondary(cpu);
> same comment as on the 8960 patch.
>
>> + per_cpu(cold_boot_done, cpu) = true;
>> + }
>> } else {
>> pr_err("%s: Invalid enable-method property: %s\n",
>> __func__, enable_method);
>> --
>> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
>> hosted by The Linux Foundation
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Thanks,
Rohit Vaswani
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists