[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <520C156D.2090003@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 18:40:29 -0500
From: Joel Fernandes <joelf@...com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mark Greer <mgreer@...malcreek.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>,
Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@...com>,
Linux OMAP List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] crypto: omap-aes: Add useful debug macros
On 08/14/2013 06:29 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 18:12 -0500, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> When DEBUG is enabled, these macros can be used to print variables
>> in integer and hex format, and clearly display which registers,
>> offsets and values are being read/written , including printing the
>> names of the offsets and their values.
> []
>> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/omap-aes.c b/drivers/crypto/omap-aes.c
> []
>> @@ -15,6 +15,14 @@
>>
>> #define pr_fmt(fmt) "%s: " fmt, __func__
>>
>> +#ifdef DEBUG
>> +#define prn(num) printk(#num "=%d\n", num)
>> +#define prx(num) printk(#num "=%x\n", num)
>
> pr_debug?
Sure, can change that.
>> +#else
>> +#define prn(num) do { } while (0)
>> +#define prx(num) do { } while (0)
>> +#endif
> []
>> @@ -172,13 +180,35 @@ struct omap_aes_dev {
>> static LIST_HEAD(dev_list);
>> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(list_lock);
>>
>> +#ifdef DEBUG
>> +#define omap_aes_read(dd, offset) \
>> + do { \
>> + omap_aes_read_1(dd, offset); \
>> + pr_debug("omap_aes_read(" #offset ")\n"); \
>> + } while (0)
>> +
>> +static inline u32 omap_aes_read_1(struct omap_aes_dev *dd, u32 offset)
>> +#else
>> static inline u32 omap_aes_read(struct omap_aes_dev *dd, u32 offset)
>> +#endif
>> {
>> return __raw_readl(dd->io_base + offset);
>> }
>>
>> +#ifdef DEBUG
>> +#define omap_aes_write(dd, offset, value) \
>> + do { \
>> + pr_debug("omap_aes_write(" #offset "=%x) value=%d\n", \
>> + offset, value); \
>> + omap_aes_write_1(dd, offset, value); \
>> + } while (0)
>> +
>> +static inline void omap_aes_write_1(struct omap_aes_dev *dd, u32 offset,
>> + u32 value)
>> +#else
>> static inline void omap_aes_write(struct omap_aes_dev *dd, u32 offset,
>> u32 value)
>> +#endif
>> {
>> __raw_writel(value, dd->io_base + offset);
>> }
>
> Umm, yuck?
>
> Is there any real value in read_1 and write_1?
Can you be more descriptive? There is a lot of value in them for debug
to show clearly sequence of read/writes. Moreover, they are no-op'd when
DEBUG is disabled.
Other than the obvious use, I guess it could be rewritten to be bit
cleaner. I can do that.
-Joel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists