[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130815093831.GA27616@pd.tnic>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 11:38:31 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>
Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
tony.luck@...el.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
rjw@...k.pl, lance.ortiz@...com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mce: acpi/apei: trace: Enable ghes memory error
trace event
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 09:22:11PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> 1) EDAC core needs to know that it should reject "hardware first"
> drivers.
-ENOPARSE. What do you mean?
> 3) If BIOS vendors add later some solution to enumerate the DIMMS
> per memory controller, channel, socket with APEI, the addition to the
> existing driver would be trivial.
Actually, with BIOS vendors wanting to do firmware-first strategy with
DRAM errors, they must have a pretty good and intimate picture of the
memory topology at hand. So it is only a logical consequence for them,
when reporting a memory error to the OS to tell us the silkscreen label
too, while at it.
And if they do that, we don't need the additional layer - just a
tracepoint from APEI and a userspace script.
It's a whole another question if they don't do that.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists