[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201308151946.26609@pali>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 19:46:26 +0200
From: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
To: Martin Peres <martin.peres@...ri.fr>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nouveau reclocking on nv40 not working since 77145f1cbdf8d28b46ff8070ca749bad821e0774
On Tuesday 13 August 2013 11:28:01 Pali Rohár wrote:
> Hello,
>
> in commit 77145f1cbdf8d28b46ff8070ca749bad821e0774 was
> introduced error which cause that on my Nvidia 6600GT card
> reclocking not working anymore. There is missing assigment of
> return value from pll_calc to ret.
>
> After this patch reclocking on my card working fine again.
> Above broken commit was introduced in kernel 3.7, so consider
> backporting this patch to older kernels too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv40_pm.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv40_pm.c index 3af5bcd..625f80d
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv40_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv40_pm.c
> @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ nv40_calc_pll(struct drm_device *dev, u32
> reg, struct nvbios_pll *pll, if (clk < pll->vco1.max_freq)
> pll->vco2.max_freq = 0;
>
> - pclk->pll_calc(pclk, pll, clk, &coef);
> + ret = pclk->pll_calc(pclk, pll, clk, &coef);
> if (ret == 0)
> return -ERANGE;
Martin, can you look at another problem with my graphics card?
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@...il.com
Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists