linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] bond: Don't set skb->queue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <520D4328.5000305@cogentembedded.com>
Date:	Fri, 16 Aug 2013 01:07:52 +0400
From:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To:	Tao Ma <tm@....ma>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bond: Don't set skb->queue_mapping in netpoll.

On 08/15/2013 12:36 PM, Tao Ma wrote:

> From: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@...bao.com>

> When we are using netpoll, we don't go through the normal
> transmit process. In this case, bond_select_queue is not called
> and qdisc_skb_cb(skb)->slave_dev_queue_mapping isn't set.

> So when netpoll_send_skb_on_dev calls ndo_start_xmit and we
> enter bond_dev_queue_xmit, we will set skb->queue_mapping to
> an invalid value and in some cases cause the driver panic the
> kernel(We meet with bnx2 panic because of a very large queue_mapping).

> This patch skip skb->queue_mapping if we find we are in netpoll.

> CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
> CC: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
> CC: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@...bao.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c |    5 +++--
>   1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> index 07f257d..97b2f52 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> @@ -405,12 +405,13 @@ int bond_dev_queue_xmit(struct bonding *bond, struct sk_buff *skb,
>
>   	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(skb->queue_mapping) !=
>   		     sizeof(qdisc_skb_cb(skb)->slave_dev_queue_mapping));
> -	skb->queue_mapping = qdisc_skb_cb(skb)->slave_dev_queue_mapping;
>
>   	if (unlikely(netpoll_tx_running(bond->dev)))
>   		bond_netpoll_send_skb(bond_get_slave_by_dev(bond, slave_dev), skb);
> -	else
> +	else {
> +		skb->queue_mapping = qdisc_skb_cb(skb)->slave_dev_queue_mapping;
>   		dev_queue_xmit(skb);
> +	}

     According to Documentation/CodingStyle, both arms of the *if* statement 
should have {} if one arm has them.

WBR, Sergei


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/