[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130815032746.GC4439@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 23:27:46 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] memblock cleanup: Remove unnecessary check in
memblock_find_in_range_node()
Hello, Tang.
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:23:19AM +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
> Furthermore, we don't need to check "if (this_end < size)" actually. Without
> this confusing check, we only waste some loops. So this patch removes the
> check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> mm/memblock.c | 3 ---
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index a847bfe..e0c626e 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -114,9 +114,6 @@ phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t start,
> this_start = clamp(this_start, start, end);
> this_end = clamp(this_end, start, end);
>
> - if (this_end < size)
> - continue;
> -
> cand = round_down(this_end - size, align);
> if (cand >= this_start)
> return cand;
Hmmm... maybe I'm missing something but are you sure? "this_end -
size" can underflow and "cand >= this_start" will be true incorrectly.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists