[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1376617039.2389.2.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 18:37:19 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@...l.com>,
Jim Hull <jim.hull@...com>, Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>,
Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
Chegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@...com>,
Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] partitions/efi: detect hybrid mbrs
On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 12:29 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:59:42 -0700 Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 14:16 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 22:21:08 -0700 Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > This patchset teaches the kernel about hybrid master boot records (MBRs), one of
> > > > the most common issues with GUID partition tables, as a workaround to layout
> > > > disk partitions to be compatible with both EFI and legacy MBR based systems.
> > > > Except for adding more pmbr checks, to better comply with the UEFI/GPT specs, the
> > > > functionality is left unchanged - we only inform (through debug) the user about
> > > > the used MBR scheme. While it is true that these restrictions can be bypassed when
> > > > forcing gpt, this is not the correct or default way of doing things, complicating
> > > > users furthermore. More details are in the individual patches.
> > >
> > > Patches look nice, although I'll cheerily admit to not having a clue
> > > what they do. What is a "hybrid MBR" anyway?
> > >
> > > Someone's editor seems to replace tabs with spaces so the patches
> > > generate quite a checkpatch storm. Please use checkpatch.
> > >
> >
> > Andrew, any chance of getting this in for 3.12?
>
> gee, I didn't review the patches because I simply have no useful
> knowledge in the area. I can check the whitespace and code comments,
> but that has the downside of creating the false impression that someone
> actually reviewed the code :(
>
> I'm struggling to think who might be better situated. Matt Fleming or
> Matt Domsch, maybe?
>
Cc'ing Matt Fleming.
Karel, I believe you took a look at these, any thoughts?
Thanks,
Davidlohr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists