[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <520E2726.304@baylibre.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 15:20:38 +0200
From: Benoit Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>
To: Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol@...com>
CC: linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
uri.y@...iscite.com, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] omap4/twl6030: typical connection to omap4 as
a separate dtsi file
Hi Ruslan,
On 16/08/2013 14:04, Ruslan Bilovol wrote:
> Hi Benoit,
>
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Benoit Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com> wrote:
>> Hi Ruslan,
>>
>> On 14/08/2013 10:35, Ruslan Bilovol wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> There is no functional changes between v1 and v2 - just
>>> added the patch for omap4-var-som - Uri Yosef confirmed
>>> this board have the same connection of OMAP4<->TWL6030 as
>>> SDP4430 board
>>
>>
>> The series looks good to me, but it will be good to have a test for Panda
>> and Variscite boards before merging it.
>
> Okay, so I just verified this patch series on PandaBoard ES2. Should I
> resubmit this series with
> fixed commit message?
No, that's fine, I already applied it and fixed the subject and the changelog.
Here it is:
commit 2e25df1e5a4af906a9b25332719ace000063eb0d
Author: Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol@...com>
Date: Wed Aug 14 11:35:47 2013 +0300
ARM: dts: twl6030: Move common configuration for OMAP4 boards in a separate dtsi file
The OMAP4 SoC family uses specially-designed PMIC (power management IC)
companion chip for power management needs: TWL6030/TWL6032.
Therefore there is a typical connection of PMIC to OMAP4 so we can
move it into separate .dtsi file and do not duplicate over
board-specific files.
Tested on OMAP4 SDP board and compile-tested for Panda board
Signed-off-by: Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol@...com>
Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>
Just let me know if you are OK with the updated version.
> However I cannot verify the patch for Variscite board because I do not
> own any such board so
> you can drop that patch. But maybe Uri Yosef can verify it. Uri?
It seems that Uri cannot test it right now, so I will have to drop that one.
Thanks,
Benoit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists