[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <82440653.410050.1376665340121.JavaMail.root@mail>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 11:02:20 -0400 (EDT)
From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...oirfairelinux.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: (gpio-pca953x) move header to
linux/platform_data/
Hi Linus,
You wrote:
> But:
>
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c | 2 +-
> (...)
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
> > b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
> > index 426c51d..8804aec 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
> > @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
> > #include <linux/irq.h>
> > #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> > #include <linux/i2c.h>
> > -#include <linux/i2c/pca953x.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_data/pca953x.h>
>
> Why does the GPIO driver need platform data from the
> I2C driver???
>
> Can't this just be made to go away?
I didn't dig that much in the driver, but I cannot imagine
another way to pass, for instance, the setup callback.
What would be a good alternative for you?
Regards,
Vivien
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists