[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130816002204.GA16114@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 17:22:04 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jens Frederich <jfrederich@...il.com>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Jon Nettleton <jon.nettleton@...il.com>,
Daniel Drake <dsd@...top.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: olpc_dcon: more big endian conformity
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 09:54:05PM +0200, Jens Frederich wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 11:04:16PM +0200, Jens Frederich wrote:
> >> Using an int which is casted to unsigned char as inbuf is messy.
> >> The code won't work on big endian systems. The patch should fix
> >> this.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jens Frederich <jfrederich@...il.com>
> >
> > This patch doesn't apply at all, can you refresh it against my
> > staging-next branch and resend it so that I can apply it?
> >
>
> Sorry for the duplicated patch 3. The subject:
> [PATCH] Staging: olpc_dcon: more big endian conformity and
> [PATCH 3/3] Staging: olpc_dcon: more big endian conformity
> is equal for the Google mail client and lands in the same
> thread. I'd use Mutt.
I do use mutt, and see two copies of this patch sent.
What happened to patch 1/3, I never got that.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists