[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <520EA5D6.3040409@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:21:10 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
CC: bcousson@...libre.com, tony@...mide.com, myungjoo.ham@...sung.com,
cw00.choi@...sung.com, rob.herring@...xeda.com, pawel.moll@....com,
mark.rutland@....com, ian.campbell@...rix.com, rob@...dley.net,
george.cherian@...com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux@....linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, balbi@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] extcon: palmas: Modified the compatible type to *ti,palmas-usb-vid*
On 08/16/2013 04:20 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> The Palmas device contains only a USB VID detector, so modified the
> compatible type to *ti,palmas-usb-vid*.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-palmas.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-palmas.txt
> PALMAS USB COMPARATOR
> Required Properties:
> - - compatible : Should be "ti,palmas-usb" or "ti,twl6035-usb"
> + - compatible : Should be "ti,palmas-usb-vid".
Has the old value been published in a release kernel? If so, it makes
sense to document both values, but say the old one is deprecated, and ...
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c
> static struct of_device_id of_palmas_match_tbl[] = {
> - { .compatible = "ti,palmas-usb", },
> - { .compatible = "ti,twl6035-usb", },
> + { .compatible = "ti,palmas-usb-vid", },
... perhaps just add the new value here, and don't remove the old values?
If not, ignore this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists