linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] qrwlock: Introducing a queue read/write lock implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <520EAC07.5050106@hp.com>
Date:	Fri, 16 Aug 2013 18:47:35 -0400
From:	Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>,
	Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>,
	"Chandramouleeswaran, Aswin" <aswin@...com>,
	"Norton, Scott J" <scott.norton@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] qrwlock: Introducing a queue read/write lock implementation

On 08/14/2013 11:57 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Waiman Long<waiman.long@...com>  wrote:
>
>> On 08/14/2013 06:20 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> * Waiman Long<waiman.long@...com>   wrote:
>>>
>>>> I would like to share with you a rwlock related system crash that I
>>>> encountered during my testing with hackbench on an 80-core DL980. The
>>>> kernel crash because of a "watchdog detected hard lockup on cpu 79". The
>>>> crashing CPU was running "write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock)" in
>>>> forget_original_parent() of the exit code path when I interrupted the
>>>> hackbench which was spawning thousands of processes. Apparently, the
>>>> remote CPU was not able to get the lock for a sufficient long time due
>>>> to the unfairness of the rwlock which I think my version of queue rwlock
>>>> will be able to alleviate this issue.
>>>>
>>>> So far, I was not able to reproduce the crash. I will try to see if I
>>>> could more consistently reproduce it.
>>> Was it an actual crash/lockup, or a longish hang followed by a lock
>>> detector splat followed by the system eventually recovering back to
>>> working order?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> 	Ingo
>> It was an actual crash initiated by the NMI handler. I think the
>> system was in a halt state after that.
> Could be a CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_HARDLOCKUP_PANIC_VALUE=1 kernel?
>
> Thanks,
>
> 	Ingo

My test system was a RHEL6.4 system. The 3.10 kernel config file was 
based on the original RHEL6.4 config file. So yes, the 
CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_HARDLOCKUP_PANIC_VALUE parameter was set.

I also found that when I bump the process count up to about 30k range, 
interrupting the main hack_bench process may not cause the other spawned 
process to die out. I will further investigate this phenomenon later 
next week.

Regards,
Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/