[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C3050A4DBA34F345975765E43127F10F1C0643F8@szxeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 02:54:04 +0000
From: Caizhiyong <caizhiyong@...wei.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Wanglin (Albert)" <albert.wanglin@...wei.com>,
Quyaxin <quyaxin@...wei.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] block: support embedded device command line partition
> > +blkdevparts=<blkdev-def>[;<blkdev-def>]
> > + <blkdev-def> := <blkdev-id>:<partdef>[,<partdef>]
> > + <partdef> := <size>[@<offset>](part-name)
> > +
> > +<blkdev-id>
> > + block device disk name, embedded device used fixed block device,
> > + it's disk name also fixed. such as: mmcblk0, mmcblk1, mmcblk0boot0.
>
> The device-name isn't always fixed.
>
> For example, what if there are multiple SDHCI controllers, one hosting a
> fixed eMMC device and the other an SD card? It's quite typical for the
> eMMC's device name (which is likely what should be affected by this
> feature) to be mmcblk0 when no SD card is present, yet be mmcblk1 when
> an SD card is present. Is there a more precise/stable way to define
> which device the command-line option applies to?
Yes. Fixed is for single controller.
For multiple controllers, currently, there is not a simple way.
I tend to do something in the eMMC driver, such as initialize order,
but I have not tried.
>
> For the root= command-line option, we use UUID= or PARTUUID= to work
> around this issue, but that won't work for naming the whole device.
>
> What about using the MMIO address of the controller hosting the device,
> or something like that?
>
MMIO may be not a good idea, it is not intuitive.
> > +<size>
> > + partition size, in bytes, such as: 512, 1m, 1G.
>
> s/m/M/?
>
> I assume M/G are MiB/GiB?
>
> Does it make sense to allow specifying the sizes in units of
> sectors/blocks? If so, which specific block/sector size in the case of
> things like NAND flash which IIRC have multiple types/levels of sectors;
> perhaps this is a bad idea. I guess we could easily add this feature
> later by introducing a new suffix, so no need to solve the issue now.
>
> > +
> > +<offset>
> > + partition start address, in bytes.
> > +
> > +(part-name)
> > + partition name, kernel send uevent with "PARTNAME". application can create
> > + a link to block device partition with the name "PARTNAME".
> > + user space application can access partition by partition name.
>
> Do partitions usually have a PARTNAME attribute when probed through
> normal mechanisms like MBR? If so, I guess this is fine.
>
> Perhaps we can just use , as the delimiter for all fields, rather than
> special-casing part-name to use (), so:
>
> size,offset,partname,size,offset,partname,...
>
> The partname field could easily be empty if not needed.
>
If no need partname, your bootargs are mmcblk0:1G,1G,1G,...
> > +Example:
> > + eMMC disk name is "mmcblk0" and "mmcblk0boot0"
> > +
> > + bootargs:
> > +
> 'blkdevparts=mmcblk0:1G(data0),1G(data1),-;mmcblk0boot0:1m(boot),-(kernel)'
> > +
> > + dmesg:
> > + mmcblk0: p1(data0) p2(data1) p3()
> > + mmcblk0boot0: p1(boot) p2(kernel)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists