[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1376631215-10704-1-git-send-email-huawei.libin@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 13:33:35 +0800
From: Libin <huawei.libin@...wei.com>
To: <tj@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
<wangyijing@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] workqueue: Fix manage_workers() RETURNS description
No functional change. The comment of function manage_workers()
RETURNS description is obvious wrong, same as the CONTEXT.
Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Libin <huawei.libin@...wei.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 7f5d4be..e8ee7a4 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -2033,8 +2033,8 @@ static bool maybe_destroy_workers(struct worker_pool *pool)
* multiple times. Does GFP_KERNEL allocations.
*
* RETURNS:
- * spin_lock_irq(pool->lock) which may be released and regrabbed
- * multiple times. Does GFP_KERNEL allocations.
+ * %false if the poll don't need management and the caller can safely
+ * start processing works, %true otherwise.
*/
static bool manage_workers(struct worker *worker)
{
--
1.8.2.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists