[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP+fKSp5ze3-qWHY_D_e3AXxnFM-AB9FBfRLjy0yOFnOp6bp4w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 00:57:50 +0200
From: Margarita Manterola <margamanterola@...il.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Maximiliano Curia <maxy@...ian.org>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Large pastes into readline enabled programs causes breakage from
v2.6.31 onwards
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/n_tty.c b/drivers/tty/n_tty.c
>> index 4bf0fc0..2ba7f4e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tty/n_tty.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/n_tty.c
>> @@ -149,7 +149,8 @@ static int set_room(struct tty_struct *tty)
>> * characters will be beeped.
>> */
>> if (left <= 0)
>> - left = ldata->icanon && !ldata->canon_data;
>> + if (waitqueue_active(&tty->read_wait))
>> + left = ldata->icanon && !ldata->canon_data;
>> old_left = tty->receive_room;
>> tty->receive_room = left;
> Was this applied? You may want to cc rjw... it is a regression, it is
> not pretty, and it is something I blieve I hit but thought it was some
> kind of "X weirdness".
There were no replies to the previous mail asking for comments, and as
far as I can see this has not been applied. I don't know who rjw is,
could you be a bit more explicit, please?
--
Besos,
Marga
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists