linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC nohz_full 1/7] nohz_full: Add Kconfig parameter for scalable detection of all-idle state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130817233817.GA14768@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Sat, 17 Aug 2013 16:38:17 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
	dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, josh@...htriplett.org,
	niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
	darren@...art.com, sbw@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC nohz_full 1/7] nohz_full: Add Kconfig parameter for
 scalable detection of all-idle state

On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 03:04:55AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 04:19:18PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > 
> > At least one CPU must keep the scheduling-clock tick running for
> > timekeeping purposes whenever there is a non-idle CPU.  However, with
> > the new nohz_full adaptive-idle machinery, it is difficult to distinguish
> > between all CPUs really being idle as opposed to all non-idle CPUs being
> > in adaptive-ticks mode.  This commit therefore adds a Kconfig parameter
> > as a first step towards enabling a scalable detection of full-system
> > idle state.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> > ---
> >  kernel/time/Kconfig | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/time/Kconfig b/kernel/time/Kconfig
> > index 70f27e8..a613c2a 100644
> > --- a/kernel/time/Kconfig
> > +++ b/kernel/time/Kconfig
> > @@ -134,6 +134,29 @@ config NO_HZ_FULL_ALL
> >  	 Note the boot CPU will still be kept outside the range to
> >  	 handle the timekeeping duty.
> >  
> > +config NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE
> > +	bool "Detect full-system idle state for full dynticks system"
> > +	depends on NO_HZ_FULL
> > +	default n
> > +	help
> > +	 At least one CPU must keep the scheduling-clock tick running
> > +	 for timekeeping purposes whenever there is a non-idle CPU,
> > +	 where "non-idle" includes CPUs with a single runnable task
> > +	 in adaptive-idle mode.
> 
> "adaptive-idle" is particularly confusing here. How about this:
> 
>     'where "non-idle" also includes dynticks CPUs as long they are
>     running non-idle tasks.' 
> 
>           Because the underlying adaptive-tick
> > +	 support cannot distinguish between all CPUs being idle and
> > +	 all CPUs each running a single task in adaptive-idle mode,
> 
> s/adaptive-idle/dynticks
> 
> Thanks.

Good point, fixed.

							Thanx, Paul

> > +	 the underlying support simply ensures that there is always
> > +	 a CPU handling the scheduling-clock tick, whether or not all
> > +	 CPUs are idle.  This Kconfig option enables scalable detection
> > +	 of the all-CPUs-idle state, thus allowing the scheduling-clock
> > +	 tick to be disabled when all CPUs are idle.  Note that scalable
> > +	 detection of the all-CPUs-idle state means that larger systems
> > +	 will be slower to declare the all-CPUs-idle state.
> > +
> > +	 Say Y if you would like to help debug all-CPUs-idle detection.
> > +
> > +	 Say N if you are unsure.
> > +
> >  config NO_HZ
> >  	bool "Old Idle dynticks config"
> >  	depends on !ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET && GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
> > -- 
> > 1.8.1.5
> > 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/