[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130818093444.GA26728@pd.tnic>
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 11:34:44 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, darren@...art.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
sbw@....edu, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/11] rcu: Expedite grace periods during
suspend/resume
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 08:17:17PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 06:37:46PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> >
> > CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ can increase grace-period durations by up to
> > a factor of four, which can result in long suspend and resume times.
> > Thus, this commit temporarily switches to expedited grace periods when
> > suspending the box and return to normal settings when resuming.
> >
> > [ paulmck: This also papers over an audio/irq bug, but hopefully that will
> > be fixed soon. ]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> This patch still seems like a hack, and there *ought* to be a better
> general solution to avoid excessive grace-period latency. Nonetheless,
> in the absence of such a solution,
> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Yeah, I'm not happy about it either but from quickly skimming over what
context we're using rcu_expedited in, the basic requirement for a fix is
for the pm core to be able to tell rcu not to stretch grace periods.
So simply setting a variable is much simpler than switching to calling
all those *_expedited() rcu flavors from the pm notifier when going
down.
Unless Paul has a better idea, of course.
The basic problem here is, however, that you need to temporarily
reconfigure the inner workings of a subsystem because hardware is
performing a power state transition. Unless someone teaches rcu about
power state transitions... :-)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists