[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG8rG2zf8CUu+1qRURRhvX8RsNx8CLXJU85qnsFjCvm0FYYuRg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 15:33:07 +0200
From: Antonios Motakis <a.motakis@...tualopensystems.com>
To: Cho KyongHo <pullip.cho@...sung.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Linux ARM Kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux IOMMU <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Samsung SOC <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm-arm <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>,
Varun Sethi <Varun.Sethi@...escale.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/exynos: Follow kernel coding style for
__sysmmu_enable return type
Yes, of course, I have no objections.
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Cho KyongHo <pullip.cho@...sung.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 15:15:49 +0200, 'Joerg Roedel' wrote:
>> KyongHo,
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 07:46:01PM +0900, Cho KyongHo wrote:
>> > __sysmmu_enable() must return 1 if it is called with the same page table.
>> > I have fixed it exynos_iommu_attach_device() to always return zero on success
>> > in the next patchset which I will post today.
>> >
>> > Thank you.
>>
>> When you are fine with these patches please put them on-top of your
>> patch-set when you re-submit. I will take them from there then.
>>
>
> Ok.
>
> Antonios,
>
> Would you mind
> if I submit your 2 patches on top of my patches with your signed-off?
>
> KyongHo.
>
>>
>> Joerg
>>
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists