[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVXeWaggY5FPKrr2fBBnKLq3Rqw9WF99N+AX5sFwBOnog@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 23:12:47 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: USB host support should depend on HAS_DMA
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 1:12 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 July 2013, Alan Stern wrote:
>> This isn't right. There are USB host controllers that use PIO, not
>> DMA. The HAS_DMA dependency should go with the controller driver, not
>> the USB core.
>>
>> On the other hand, the USB core does call various routines like
>> dma_unmap_single. It ought to be possible to compile these calls even
>> when DMA isn't enabled. That is, they should be defined as do-nothing
>> stubs.
>
> The asm-generic/dma-mapping-broken.h file intentionally causes link
> errors, but that could be changed.
>
> The better approach in my mind would be to replace code like
>
>
> if (hcd->self.uses_dma)
>
> with
>
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_DMA) && hcd->self.uses_dma) {
>
> which will reliably cause that reference to be omitted from object code,
> but not stop giving link errors for drivers that actually require
> DMA.
This can be done for drivers/usb/core/hcd.c.
But I'm a bit puzzled by drivers/usb/core/buffer.c. E.g.
void *hcd_buffer_alloc(...)
{
....
/* some USB hosts just use PIO */
if (!bus->controller->dma_mask &&
!(hcd->driver->flags & HCD_LOCAL_MEM)) {
*dma = ~(dma_addr_t) 0;
return kmalloc(size, mem_flags);
}
for (i = 0; i < HCD_BUFFER_POOLS; i++) {
if (size <= pool_max[i])
return dma_pool_alloc(hcd->pool[i], mem_flags, dma);
}
return dma_alloc_coherent(hcd->self.controller, size, dma, mem_flags);
}
which is called from usb_hcd_map_urb_for_dma():
if (hcd->self.uses_dma) {
....
} else if (hcd->driver->flags & HCD_LOCAL_MEM) {
ret = hcd_alloc_coherent(
urb->dev->bus, mem_flags,
&urb->setup_dma,
(void **)&urb->setup_packet,
sizeof(struct usb_ctrlrequest),
DMA_TO_DEVICE);
...
}
So if DMA is not used (!hcd->self.uses_dma, i.e. bus->controller->dma_mask
is zero), and HCD_LOCAL_MEM is set, we still end up calling dma_pool_alloc()?
(Naively, I'm not so familiar with the USB code) I'd expect it to use
kmalloc() instead?
So I would change it to
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_DMA) ||
(!bus->controller->dma_mask &&
!(hcd->driver->flags & HCD_LOCAL_MEM))) {
*dma = ~(dma_addr_t) 0;
return kmalloc(size, mem_flags);
}
Thanks for your clarification!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists