[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130818031831.GM28923@leaf>
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 20:18:32 -0700
From: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, darren@...art.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
sbw@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/11] rcu: Expedite during suspend and
resume only on smallish systems
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 06:37:47PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Expedited grace periods are of dubious benefit on very large systems,
> so this commit restricts their automated use during suspend and resume
> to systems of 256 or fewer CPUs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
This seems odd. If expedited grace periods don't help on large systems,
shouldn't you just compile them out entirely and ignore rcu_expedited,
rather than just in this one special case?
In any case, if this patch still makes sense, please squash it into the
previous one.
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists