[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1376901429.403.150.camel@smile>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:37:09 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dan Williams <djbw@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dmaengine: make dmatest less noisy
On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 10:25 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Commit 95019c8c5 "dmatest: gather test results in the linked list"
> started to warning whenever we add results to a test thread.
> A warning for something completely normal? This is just cluttering
> my terminal. Move to debug prints.
>
> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> --- a/drivers/dma/dmatest.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dmatest.c
> @@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ static int thread_result_add(struct dmatest_info *info,
> list_add_tail(&tr->node, &r->results);
> mutex_unlock(&info->results_lock);
>
> - pr_warn("%s\n", thread_result_get(r->name, tr));
> + pr_debug("%s\n", thread_result_get(r->name, tr));
This is the idea behind original DMATEST module logic.
As far as I understand we would like to have them as warnings in case
when driver is compiled in and tests are run from the beginning.
Though, I sent a correction patch that moves "No error" messages to
debug level which, I think, makes sense. I don't know why Dan still keep
silent on my last message in the discussion [1].
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1581822.html
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists