[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5211EDAE.1090407@baylibre.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 12:04:30 +0200
From: Benoit Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>
To: Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol@...com>
CC: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
uri.y@...iscite.com, linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] omap4/twl6030: typical connection to omap4 as
a separate dtsi file
Hi Ruslan,
On 19/08/2013 08:14, Ruslan Bilovol wrote:
> Hi Benoit,
>
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Benoit Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com> wrote:
>> Hi Ruslan,
>>
>> On 16/08/2013 14:04, Ruslan Bilovol wrote:
>>> Hi Benoit,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Benoit Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Ruslan,
>>>>
>>>> On 14/08/2013 10:35, Ruslan Bilovol wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> There is no functional changes between v1 and v2 - just
>>>>> added the patch for omap4-var-som - Uri Yosef confirmed
>>>>> this board have the same connection of OMAP4<->TWL6030 as
>>>>> SDP4430 board
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The series looks good to me, but it will be good to have a test for Panda
>>>> and Variscite boards before merging it.
>>>
>>> Okay, so I just verified this patch series on PandaBoard ES2. Should I
>>> resubmit this series with
>>> fixed commit message?
>>
>> No, that's fine, I already applied it and fixed the subject and the changelog.
>>
>> Here it is:
>>
>> commit 2e25df1e5a4af906a9b25332719ace000063eb0d
>> Author: Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol@...com>
>> Date: Wed Aug 14 11:35:47 2013 +0300
>>
>> ARM: dts: twl6030: Move common configuration for OMAP4 boards in a separate dtsi file
>>
>> The OMAP4 SoC family uses specially-designed PMIC (power management IC)
>> companion chip for power management needs: TWL6030/TWL6032.
>> Therefore there is a typical connection of PMIC to OMAP4 so we can
>> move it into separate .dtsi file and do not duplicate over
>> board-specific files.
>>
>> Tested on OMAP4 SDP board and compile-tested for Panda board
>
> Just for archives: I've successfully tested it on PandaBoard ES2 last
> week as well.
Great, I'll update the changelog before pushing it.
>> Signed-off-by: Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol@...com>
>> Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>
>>
>>
>> Just let me know if you are OK with the updated version.
>
> Yes, this version looks good to me. Thanks for picking it up!
>
>>
>>> However I cannot verify the patch for Variscite board because I do not
>>> own any such board so
>>> you can drop that patch. But maybe Uri Yosef can verify it. Uri?
>>
>> It seems that Uri cannot test it right now, so I will have to drop that one.
>
> Okay, let's wait for Uri's verification.
I'll keep it for 3.13.
Thanks,
Benoit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists