[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130819015046.GB29406@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 18:50:46 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, darren@...art.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
sbw@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 7/9] nohz_full: Add full-system-idle
arguments to API
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 08:11:20PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 06:49:42PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > This commit adds an isidle and jiffies argument to force_qs_rnp(),
> > dyntick_save_progress_counter(), and rcu_implicit_dynticks_qs() to enable
> > RCU's force-quiescent-state process to check for full-system idle.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> > Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
> > [ paulmck: Use true and false for boolean constants per Lai Jiangshan. ]
>
> One optional comment below; with or without that,
> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
>
> > kernel/rcutree.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> > index b0d2cc3..f1a0b05 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> > @@ -246,7 +246,9 @@ module_param(jiffies_till_next_fqs, ulong, 0644);
> >
> > static void rcu_start_gp_advanced(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
> > struct rcu_data *rdp);
> > -static void force_qs_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, int (*f)(struct rcu_data *));
> > +static void force_qs_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp,
> > + int (*f)(struct rcu_data *, bool *, unsigned long *),
> > + bool *isidle, unsigned long *maxj);
>
> You might consider giving the parameters of the function pointer names
> (both here and in the definition), to make it more self-documenting.
Forces a line break, but given that I couldn't immediately recall all
of the parameter names myself, I made the change. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists