[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130819144557.GH24092@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 16:45:57 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf x86: Make intel_pmu_enable_all to enable only
active events
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 04:31:31PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Yeah, I think you can have one NMI pending because it came
> while you were already servicing an NMI interrupt. Though, this
> is very unlikely.
Yeah exceedingly rare. I'm also fairly certain I've had NMIs right after
clearing EN bits. Although I cannot remember if that was on Intel or AMD
hardware, nor on what specific model :/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists