linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: wire in generic parport.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1376879761.11104.23.camel@t520.redhat.com>
Date:	Sun, 18 Aug 2013 22:36:01 -0400
From:	Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: wire in generic parport.h

On Sun, 2013-08-18 at 22:25 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com> wrote:
> > The arm64 port doesn't provide a parport.h which causes a build failure
> > with some configurations:
> >
> >   drivers/parport/parport_pc.c:67:25: fatal error: asm/parport.h: No such file or directory
> >    #include <asm/parport.h>
> >
> > This patch wires in the generic parport.h for arm64.
> 
> Can arm64 have a PC-style parport?

Good question. I'm not sure, but really doubt it.

> 
> If not, you're better off disabling it in drivers/parport/Kconfig.
> 
> You will receive bonus points for introducing ARCH_MAY_HAVE_PC_PARPORT,
> cfr. ARCH_MAY_HAVE_PC_FDC.
> 

Yes, good point. I'll work up a new patch. I can use some bonus points.

--Mark


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/