[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130819165549.GD19712@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 17:55:49 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"konrad.wilk@...cle.com" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"Ian.Campbell@...rix.com" <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/10] arm64: do not initialize arm64_swiotlb if
dma_ops is already set
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:10:49PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
> CC: catalin.marinas@....com
> CC: will.deacon@....com
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index 4bd7579..a006e84 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ static struct dma_map_ops arm64_swiotlb_dma_ops = {
>
> void __init arm64_swiotlb_init(void)
> {
> + if (dma_ops != NULL)
> + return;
> dma_ops = &arm64_swiotlb_dma_ops;
> swiotlb_init(1);
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists