linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 3/3] PCI: tegra: Support driver unbinding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52128650.7090009@wwwdotorg.org>
Date:	Mon, 19 Aug 2013 14:55:44 -0600
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
CC:	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/3] PCI: tegra: Support driver unbinding

On 08/19/2013 02:16 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 09:21:53AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 08/15/2013 04:34 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 03:43:40PM -0600, Stephen Warren
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 08/13/2013 05:12 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>>>> Implement the platform driver's .remove() callback to free
>>>>> all resources allocated during driver setup and call 
>>>>> pci_common_exit() to cleanup ARM specific datastructures.
>>>>> Unmap the fixed PCI I/O mapping by calling the new
>>>>> pci_iounmap_io() function in the new .teardown() callback.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Finally, no longer set the .suppress_bind_attrs field to
>>>>> true to allow the driver to unbind from a device.
>>>> 
>>>>> +static int tegra_pcie_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>> +{ +	struct tegra_pcie *pcie = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>>>> + struct tegra_pcie_bus *bus, *tmp; +	int err; + + 
>>>>> pci_common_exit(&pcie->sys); + +
>>>>> list_for_each_entry_safe(bus, tmp, &pcie->busses, list) { +
>>>>> vunmap(bus->area->addr); + kfree(bus); +	} + +	if
>>>>> (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)) { +		err = 
>>>>> tegra_pcie_disable_msi(pcie); +		if (err < 0) +			return
>>>>> err; + }
>>>> 
>>>> Wouldn't it make sense to do that as early as possible in
>>>> the function, to make sure that no MSI accidentally fires
>>>> after some of the cleanup has already happened?
>>> 
>>> I don't think that's strictly necessary in this case. After
>>> the call to pci_common_exit() there are no PCI devices left,
>>> there's not even a bus left. All MSI users should have cleaned
>>> up after themselves.
>>> 
>>> Given that I thought it more useful to mirror the setup done
>>> in .probe() to make it clearer what's being undone (and
>>> potentially what's missing).
>> 
>> That makes sense SW-wise, but what about mis-behaving HW that
>> triggers an MSI even when it's been told not to? I assume that 
>> tegra_pcie_disable_msi() unrequests the IRQ, hence solves that 
>> problem, if done early enough.
> 
> To be honest, I'm not sure about the side-effects that this will
> have. tegra_pcie_disable_msi() does quite a bit more than just
> masking the interrupts. It also completely removes the IRQ domain
> that provides the MSI interrupts. While I haven't tried it yet I
> can imagine that it will cause crashes at a later point when
> drivers want to disable MSI on a device and the IRQ domain having
> vanished from underneath.

Surely by the time the PCIe controller device has been remove()d then
all devices for PCIe "client" devices have also been removed.

But I guess the problem is if the controller is added back, yet the
IRQ resources aren't re-parsed under the new IRQ domain? Still, that
seems like an unrelated issue to exactly where the MSI IRQ domain gets
cleaned up in the host controller's remove().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/