[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1308192315000.21654@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 23:22:02 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: rfc: trivial patches and slow deaths?
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013, Joe Perches wrote:
> This is a 7 line patch that corrects logging defects that has had no
> reply from you for the last month.
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2833648/
This hasn't missed any Linus' major release, as it has been submitted post
3.11 merge, right? (hint, that was Jul 4th).
If this would miss *next* major Linus' release, I would accept your
complaints. But this is definitely not the case.
Joe, patience is a virtue. Especially when it comes to lower-priority
stuff.
> I think that's overly long a time frame (any patch series will bitrot)
> and too opaque for trivial patch submitters to have any idea what's
> going on.
Again, only large, corss-subsystem series with a lot of maintainers CCed
are generally delayed.
> Also, if you're concerned that the trivial tree wouldn't merge well in
> next,
That's not my concern. My concern is
- avoid work duplication
- avoid git history pollution (again, especially by trivial stuff)
- avoid unecessary stepping on maintainer's toes by something that has
such a low importance as trivial.git
Thanks for taking care,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists