linux-kernel - Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.10.6-rt3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130819202903.692097ea@gandalf.local.home>
Date:	Mon, 19 Aug 2013 20:29:03 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@...ma.Stanford.EDU>
Cc:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.10.6-rt3

On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:23:44 -0700
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@...ma.Stanford.EDU> wrote:


> > The problem is that bcache is using new semaphore functions which it
> > just introduced which rt does not know about. The comment above their
> > definition says that it is wrong to use them and completion is the
> > right way to do it.
> > So my question is, why don't we use completion but this nasty hack?

I think I'm going to send them an email about that.

> 
> In the meanwhile, any hope of a patch to be able to compile and test 
> with my current configuration?

Can you boot without enabling CONFIG_BCACHE?

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/