linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] acpi_i2c: set MODULE_LICENSE, MODULE_AUTHOR, and MODULE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130820033403.GD4587@cantor.us.oracle.com>
Date:	Mon, 19 Aug 2013 20:34:03 -0700
From:	Jerry Snitselaar <jerry.snitselaar@...cle.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi_i2c: set MODULE_LICENSE, MODULE_AUTHOR, and
 MODULE_DESCRIPTION

On Tue Aug 20 13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, August 19, 2013 04:35:29 PM Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> > On Tue Aug 20 13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Monday, August 19, 2013 09:16:14 AM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 06:26:35PM -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> > > > > Without MODULE_LICENSE set, I get the following with modprobe:
> > > > > 
> > > > > acpi_i2c: module license 'unspecified' taints kernel.
> > > > > acpi_i2c: Unknown symbol i2c_new_device (err 0)
> > > > > acpi_i2c: Unknown symbol acpi_dev_get_resources (err 0)
> > > > > acpi_i2c: Unknown symbol acpi_dev_resource_interrupt (err 0)
> > > > > acpi_i2c: Unknown symbol acpi_dev_free_resource_list (err 0)
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jerry.snitselaar@...cle.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Looks good to me.
> > > > 
> > > > Acked-by: Mika Westerbeg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > Well, OK, but do we need to be able to build that as a module?
> > > 
> > > Maybe it should just be yes or no?
> > > 
> > > Rafael
> > > 
> > 
> > Perhaps have depends on I2C=y and be a bool instead of tristate?
> 
> Yes, that's the idea.
> 
Does this look okay Mika?

[PATCH] acpi_i2c: do not build as loadable module

Change from tristate to bool, and depend on I2C=y

Signed-off-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jerry.snitselaar@...cle.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
index 100bd72..183a309 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
@@ -181,8 +181,9 @@ config ACPI_DOCK
          drive bays such as the IBM Ultrabay and the Dell Module Bay.
 
 config ACPI_I2C
-       def_tristate I2C
-       depends on I2C
+       bool "I2C"
+       depends on I2C=y
+       default n
        help
          ACPI I2C enumeration support.
 
-- 
1.8.4.rc3.2.g2c2b664
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/