[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5212E76A.40903@asianux.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:50:02 +0800
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
To: dipankar@...ibm.com, Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] kernel/rcutree.c: deem to be lazy if there are no callbacks.
According to the comment above rcu_cpu_has_callbacks(): "If there are
no callbacks, all of them are deemed to be lazy".
So when both 'hc' and 'al' are false, '*all_lazy' should be true, not
false.
Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
---
kernel/rcutree.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 5b53a89..9ee9565 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -2725,7 +2725,7 @@ static int rcu_cpu_has_callbacks(int cpu, bool *all_lazy)
hc = true;
}
if (all_lazy)
- *all_lazy = al;
+ *all_lazy = !hc ? true : al;
return hc;
}
--
1.7.7.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists