linux-kernel - RE: mfd: as3722: introducing ams AS3722 PMIC driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <EB31996D403C2C48A47628A08DCCFD2901857BCEF5@SUX2182.office.amsiag.com>
Date:	Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:39:48 +0200
From:	Florian Lobmaier <Florian.Lobmaier@....com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: mfd: as3722: introducing ams AS3722 PMIC driver

On Tue, 20 Aug 2013, Lee Jones wrote:
> - http://kparal.wordpress.com/2011/08/18/git-tip-of-the-day-splitting-changes-into-several-patches/

> - http://nuclearsquid.com/writings/git-add/

Thank you very much for your hints and clarification on how to split up the patches. I think this point is clear to me now. We will need of course some time to split up the patches as requested.

In addition, how to deal with the sub-drivers of the mfd? Should those be included in the mfd driver patch as they are introduced or should they be treated as separate units?

Thanks again for your help, but as you might have already recognized, we are kernel newbies. At least in terms of getting code upstream.