linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf trace: Make command line arguments consistent with perf-record

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52137AF2.5070907@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 20 Aug 2013 08:19:30 -0600
From:	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf trace: Make command line arguments consistent with
 perf-record

On 8/19/13 1:06 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:04:30AM -0600, David Ahern escreveu:
>> Common arguments like thread id, CPU list, mmap pages, etc should be
>> consistent across perf commands.
>
> Ok, at some point I'll add a 'perf strace' alias that will resume trying
> to map the 'strace' single letter options.
>
> Can you check if this clashes with the -o patch I added today?

I just did remote update again and I do not see a -o patch in any of the 
branches.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/