[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <7734F2CE-580D-4D0C-94ED-D0B4ACB19AC8@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 09:49:42 -0500
From: Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
To: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>
Cc: "ohad@...ery.com" <ohad@...ery.com>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>,
Eric Holmberg <eholmber@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] hwspinlock/msm: Add support for Qualcomm MSM HW Mutex block
On Aug 15, 2013, at 8:35 AM, Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 20:09 +0100, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> +Required properties:
>> +- compatible: should be "qcom,tcsr-mutex"
>> +- reg: Should contain registers location and length of mutex registers
>> +- reg-names:
>> + "mutex-base" - string to identify mutex registers
>
> Just out of curiosity, why is reg-names required? Especially if there
> seem to be only one set of registers?
>
> Paweł
At one point I thought there was going to be more than one reg region, I can drop it. However, I dont see any issue with a binding making it required if it desires.
- k
--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists