linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 02/17] ARM: call clk_of_init from time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52138F56.6030008@wwwdotorg.org>
Date:	Tue, 20 Aug 2013 09:46:30 -0600
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
CC:	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 02/17] ARM: call clk_of_init from time_init

On 08/19/2013 08:04 PM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> Most DT ARM machs require common clock providers initialized before timers.
> Currently, arch/arm machs use .init_time to call clk_of_init right before
> clocksource_of_init. This prevents to remove that hook and use the default
> hook instead. clk_of_init now checks for multiple calls to it, so add
> the call to ARM arch time_init by default.

Some SoCs call this function in .init_irq() rather than .init_time().
Perhaps we adjust this patch to do that instead. That way, we can
presumably get rid of patch 1/17 since we can eliminate any duplicate
calls, and adjust patch 14/17 (Tegra board file) to remove its custom
call to of_clock_init(NULL)?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/