| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1308200846180.971@eggly.anvils>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 08:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Otcheretianski, Andrei" <andrei.otcheretianski@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Subject: Re: 3.11-rc6 genetlink locking fix offends lockdep
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:28:58AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > Something like the patch below, perhaps? Completely untested so far.
>
> Yeah, this one seems to fix it here (I was seeing the same lockdep splat
> as Hugh).
Not so good for me: it fixed the original splat, but a few seconds later:
[ 4.073542] e1000e 0000:00:19.0: irq 43 for MSI/MSI-X
[ 4.175849] e1000e 0000:00:19.0: irq 43 for MSI/MSI-X
[ 4.176223] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth1: link is not ready
[ 4.182322] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: L1 Enabled; Disabling L0S
[ 4.182537] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: Radio type=0x0-0x3-0x1
[ 4.405766] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: L1 Enabled; Disabling L0S
[ 4.405973] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: Radio type=0x0-0x3-0x1
[ 4.504441] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan1: link is not ready
[ 6.204569] input: PS/2 Generic Mouse as /devices/platform/i8042/serio1/serio2/input/input8
[ 7.662343]
[ 7.662361] ======================================================
[ 7.662393] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[ 7.662426] 3.11.0-rc6 #5 Not tainted
[ 7.662462] -------------------------------------------------------
[ 7.662500] wpa_supplicant/418 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 7.662533] (nlk->cb_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81480122>] __netlink_dump_start+0xae/0x14e
[ 7.662603]
[ 7.662603] but task is already holding lock:
[ 7.662638] (genl_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8148204d>] genl_lock+0x12/0x14
[ 7.662695]
[ 7.662695] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 7.662695]
[ 7.662743]
[ 7.662743] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 7.662788]
[ 7.662788] -> #1 (genl_mutex){+.+.+.}:
[ 7.662827] [<ffffffff810b34d2>] __lock_acquire+0x865/0x956
[ 7.662870] [<ffffffff810b39fc>] lock_acquire+0x57/0x6d
[ 7.662909] [<ffffffff81583e52>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5e/0x345
[ 7.662951] [<ffffffff8148204d>] genl_lock+0x12/0x14
[ 7.662989] [<ffffffff814822cc>] ctrl_dumpfamily+0x2b/0xea
[ 7.663029] [<ffffffff8147f1b4>] netlink_dump+0x88/0x1d7
[ 7.663069] [<ffffffff81480187>] __netlink_dump_start+0x113/0x14e
[ 7.663113] [<ffffffff81482143>] genl_rcv_msg+0xf4/0x252
[ 7.663152] [<ffffffff81481742>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x3e/0x8c
[ 7.663192] [<ffffffff8148199b>] genl_rcv+0x24/0x34
[ 7.663228] [<ffffffff814811ca>] netlink_unicast+0xed/0x17a
[ 7.663270] [<ffffffff814815d4>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2fb/0x345
[ 7.663311] [<ffffffff814503f7>] sock_sendmsg+0x79/0x8e
[ 7.663351] [<ffffffff81450707>] ___sys_sendmsg+0x231/0x2be
[ 7.663391] [<ffffffff81453228>] __sys_sendmsg+0x3d/0x5e
[ 7.663431] [<ffffffff81453256>] SyS_sendmsg+0xd/0x19
[ 7.663469] [<ffffffff81587c12>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 7.663513]
[ 7.663513] -> #0 (nlk->cb_mutex){+.+.+.}:
[ 7.663554] [<ffffffff810b1fb0>] validate_chain.isra.21+0x836/0xe8e
[ 7.663599] [<ffffffff810b34d2>] __lock_acquire+0x865/0x956
[ 7.663640] [<ffffffff810b39fc>] lock_acquire+0x57/0x6d
[ 7.663679] [<ffffffff81583e52>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5e/0x345
[ 7.663722] [<ffffffff81480122>] __netlink_dump_start+0xae/0x14e
[ 7.663765] [<ffffffff81482143>] genl_rcv_msg+0xf4/0x252
[ 7.663804] [<ffffffff81481742>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x3e/0x8c
[ 7.663844] [<ffffffff8148199b>] genl_rcv+0x24/0x34
[ 7.663881] [<ffffffff814811ca>] netlink_unicast+0xed/0x17a
[ 7.663921] [<ffffffff814815d4>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2fb/0x345
[ 7.663961] [<ffffffff814503f7>] sock_sendmsg+0x79/0x8e
[ 7.664000] [<ffffffff81450707>] ___sys_sendmsg+0x231/0x2be
[ 7.664041] [<ffffffff81453228>] __sys_sendmsg+0x3d/0x5e
[ 7.664081] [<ffffffff81453256>] SyS_sendmsg+0xd/0x19
[ 7.664119] [<ffffffff81587c12>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 7.664161]
[ 7.664161] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 7.664161]
[ 7.666543] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 7.666543]
[ 7.668877] CPU0 CPU1
[ 7.670032] ---- ----
[ 7.671165] lock(genl_mutex);
[ 7.672298] lock(nlk->cb_mutex);
[ 7.673424] lock(genl_mutex);
[ 7.674532] lock(nlk->cb_mutex);
[ 7.675607]
[ 7.675607] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 7.675607]
[ 7.678696] 2 locks held by wpa_supplicant/418:
[ 7.679704] #0: (cb_lock){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff8148198c>] genl_rcv+0x15/0x34
[ 7.680772] #1: (genl_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8148204d>] genl_lock+0x12/0x14
[ 7.681840]
[ 7.681840] stack backtrace:
[ 7.683933] CPU: 0 PID: 418 Comm: wpa_supplicant Not tainted 3.11.0-rc6 #5
[ 7.685022] Hardware name: LENOVO 4174EH1/4174EH1, BIOS 8CET51WW (1.31 ) 11/29/2011
[ 7.686118] ffffffff81cc8750 ffff88022b8117b8 ffffffff8157cf90 0000000000000006
[ 7.687230] ffffffff81d0a450 ffff88022b811808 ffffffff8157a8a8 0000000000000001
[ 7.688347] ffff880230d0a080 ffff880230d0a080 ffff880230d0a778 ffff880230d0a080
[ 7.689461] Call Trace:
[ 7.690551] [<ffffffff8157cf90>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x84
[ 7.691657] [<ffffffff8157a8a8>] print_circular_bug+0x2ad/0x2be
[ 7.692775] [<ffffffff810b1fb0>] validate_chain.isra.21+0x836/0xe8e
[ 7.693893] [<ffffffff810b34d2>] __lock_acquire+0x865/0x956
[ 7.695012] [<ffffffff81480122>] ? __netlink_dump_start+0xae/0x14e
[ 7.696137] [<ffffffff810b39fc>] lock_acquire+0x57/0x6d
[ 7.697275] [<ffffffff81480122>] ? __netlink_dump_start+0xae/0x14e
[ 7.698404] [<ffffffff81583e52>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5e/0x345
[ 7.699541] [<ffffffff81480122>] ? __netlink_dump_start+0xae/0x14e
[ 7.700696] [<ffffffff81586c32>] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x2d/0x4a
[ 7.701840] [<ffffffff81480122>] __netlink_dump_start+0xae/0x14e
[ 7.702991] [<ffffffff81482143>] genl_rcv_msg+0xf4/0x252
[ 7.704143] [<ffffffff81536380>] ? nl80211_dump_mpath+0x10d/0x10d
[ 7.705317] [<ffffffff8148204f>] ? genl_lock+0x14/0x14
[ 7.706464] [<ffffffff81481742>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x3e/0x8c
[ 7.707614] [<ffffffff8148199b>] genl_rcv+0x24/0x34
[ 7.708756] [<ffffffff814811ca>] netlink_unicast+0xed/0x17a
[ 7.709890] [<ffffffff814815d4>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2fb/0x345
[ 7.711018] [<ffffffff814503f7>] sock_sendmsg+0x79/0x8e
[ 7.712144] [<ffffffff810f86fa>] ? might_fault+0x52/0xa2
[ 7.713280] [<ffffffff81450707>] ___sys_sendmsg+0x231/0x2be
[ 7.714400] [<ffffffff810fd37b>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x47d/0x49d
[ 7.715525] [<ffffffff81087aa5>] ? up_read+0x1b/0x32
[ 7.716663] [<ffffffff81053c34>] ? __do_page_fault+0x370/0x414
[ 7.717789] [<ffffffff811488e4>] ? fget_light+0x115/0x377
[ 7.718922] [<ffffffff810f86fa>] ? might_fault+0x52/0xa2
[ 7.720052] [<ffffffff81453228>] __sys_sendmsg+0x3d/0x5e
[ 7.721192] [<ffffffff81453256>] SyS_sendmsg+0xd/0x19
[ 7.722309] [<ffffffff81587c12>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 11.044520] wlan1: authenticate with c0:3f:0e:ad:ff:ee
[ 11.096583] wlan1: send auth to c0:3f:0e:ad:ff:ee (try 1/3)
[ 11.099448] wlan1: authenticated
[ 11.100813] wlan1: associate with c0:3f:0e:ad:ff:ee (try 1/3)
[ 11.105771] wlan1: RX AssocResp from c0:3f:0e:ad:ff:ee (capab=0x411 status=0 aid=6)
[ 11.114801] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan1: link becomes ready
[ 11.115884] wlan1: associated
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists