[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52139BC3.8030907@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 19:39:31 +0300
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
CC: Hein Tibosch <hein_tibosch@...oo.es>, <balbi@...com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-omap: always send stop after nack
On 08/19/2013 03:11 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>> Which means your original patch starts to make a lot more sense. I
>>> wonder is this is really what we should be doing though - breaking out
>>> of the loop, I mean.
>
> Yup, that is fine. I applied the old patch with Acks from Hein and
> Felipe to -next. Thanks!
Thanks.
>
>> It looks like TI's i2c-davinci will have the same problem as i2c-omap,
>> and will need the same change.
>
> Somebody up for this?
>
Regards,
-grygorii
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists