[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130820164343.GA3958@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 09:43:43 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, lwn@....net,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.0.92
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 09:33:30AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > Johannes Berg (1):
> > genetlink: fix family dump race
>
> This one turns out to be buggy, see thread called "3.11-rc6 genetlink
> locking fix offends lockdep".
Yeah, I messed up in keeping it here, I'll go revert it and push out a
new 3.0 release.
> I really think there should be delay before stable picks up stuff from
> mainline, unless it's something particularly critical and
> well-discussed.. Maybe a week or so.
I can do that, it's just hard to tell from my end what is "well
discussed" all the time.
> Now it's both in 3.0 and 3.10, so the revert (unless we find a better
> fix - and the first two patches have already failed) will have to go
> there too.
I thought that there was a fix already for this... Ah, no, that was for
another reported regression in an older 3.10-stable release, my bad.
Johannes, what do you want to do here? Just revert it in Linus's tree
for now, given the late -rc cycle?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists