[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52139F0F.6090507@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 10:53:35 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: George Cherian <george.cherian@...com>
CC: balbi@...com, myungjoo.ham@...sung.com, cw00.choi@...sung.com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, grant.likely@...aro.org,
rob@...dley.net, ian.campbell@...rix.com, mark.rutland@....com,
pawel.moll@....com, rob.herring@...xeda.com,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
bcousson@...libre.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] extcon: extcon-dra7xx: Add extcon driver for USB
ID detection
On 08/20/2013 12:55 AM, George Cherian wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Thanks for your review.
>
> On 8/20/2013 1:01 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>
>> On 08/16/2013 04:13 AM, George Cherian wrote:
>>> Adding extcon driver for USB ID detection to dynamically
>>> configure USB Host/Peripheral mode.
>>> diff --git
>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-dra7xx.txt
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-dra7xx.txt
>>> +EXTCON FOR DRA7xx
>>> +
>>> +Required Properties:
>> Please at lest explain what a DRA7xxx is, and the purpose of the HW
>> module this binding describes.
>
> DRA7xx is the SoC name and the USB VID detection is implemented via gpio's
> Basically it does only ID detection via GPIO and there is no VBUS
> detection in h/w.
If there's no SoC-specific HW, then the binding has nothing to do with
the SoC; it's entirely generic.
I think instead, you need to define a generic "gpio-usb-vid" binding
instead.
Otherwise, ever SoC that doesn't have explicit USB VID detection HW is
going to re-invent the exact same binding, with pointless differences,
rather than using a single generic binding.
>>> + - compatible : Should be "ti,dra7xx-usb"
>>
>> If this is a USB VID detector rather than a full USB host controller,
>> then "usb" in the binding is a bit over-reaching. Perhaps "-usb-vid" or
>> "-usb-vid-detector" would be more accurate.
>
> This will be renamed to dra7xx-extcon.
So no, that rename doesn't sound correct.
>>> + - gpios : phandle to ID pin and interrupt gpio.
>>
>> Why does the interrupt line need to be included in a list of GPIOs?
>
> ID pins are connected to pcf8575, and the pcf8575's interrupt line is
> inturn connected to
> gpio bank6 pin 11, we use this gpio interrupt to detect the ID pin change.
In that case, the PCF8575 node needs to be a GPIO controller and an IRQ
controller, as does the driver for the PCF8575. This binding should have
a single entry in the gpios property, and the driver can call
gpio_to_irq() on that so it knows which IRQ to request.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists