[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrXnf8V+CgHDwEEviBkn0bJ60_H6G6WPmZxkQF85bqj3TQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 12:38:53 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Colin Walters <walters@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH? fix unshare(NEWPID) && vfork()
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 08/20, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
>> > On 08/20, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> Huh? Doesn't this mean that unshare(CLONE_NEWPID); vfork() will work
>> with your patches,
>
> I hope,
>
>> but vfork(); unshare(CLONE_NEWPID) will fail? (I
>> admit I haven't tested it.)
>
> Do you mean that the child does unshare(CLONE_NEWPID) before exec?
> It should fail with or without this patch.
>
Exactly. Shouldn't it succeed?
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists