[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5213C7E1.4070401@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 21:47:45 +0200
From: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
CC: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 02/17] ARM: call clk_of_init from time_init
On 08/20/2013 05:46 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 08/19/2013 08:04 PM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>> Most DT ARM machs require common clock providers initialized before timers.
>> Currently, arch/arm machs use .init_time to call clk_of_init right before
>> clocksource_of_init. This prevents to remove that hook and use the default
>> hook instead. clk_of_init now checks for multiple calls to it, so add
>> the call to ARM arch time_init by default.
>
> Some SoCs call this function in .init_irq() rather than .init_time().
> Perhaps we adjust this patch to do that instead. That way, we can
> presumably get rid of patch 1/17 since we can eliminate any duplicate
> calls, and adjust patch 14/17 (Tegra board file) to remove its custom
> call to of_clock_init(NULL)?
Currently as of -next from yesterday, only tegra is requiring clocks
that early, while others are fine with them close to timers. I really
have no strong opinion on that. That decision should rather be made
by those with a far more complete insight of the consequences than I
have.
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists